Title of document: Indigenous agroforestry practices in two districts in the northern part of Lao PDR

Authors: Houmchitsavath Sodarak; Chanhpeng Ditsaphon; Vienghad Thammavong; Nonggnao Ounthammasith; and Olle Forshed

Ministry/Government Agency/Organisation: Northern Agriculture and Forestry Research Centre; Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme

Geographic focus: Laos

School of agroecology: Agro-forestry

Objective of the document: To find out and document more about indigenous agroforestry practices in northern Laos so that good ideas and practices could be shared to other farmers to increase their livelihood.

Introduction: In the north of Lao PDR people live close to the nature and their main activity is growing rice. Shifting cultivation is the dominating practice and upland rice is the dominating crop on the sloping hills. Paddy field practices are also to some extent common if there is available land for that activity. Also other crops then rice is cultivated in the upland farming land, such as corn, Job’s tear and a wide range of vegetables. These crops are often integrated in the traditional rice shifting cultivation practice or grown more intensively close to rivers where the land is often more fertile. The shifting cultivation practice in Lao PDR has been widely described in literature; see e.g. Roder (2001) and Sodarak (1998), and today we know quite a lot of how it is practiced. Shifting cultivation could be seen as an agroforestry practice since it is, if carried out in a good way with long fallows, a combination of agriculture and forestry. Side by side with the shifting cultivation practice also other agroforestry practices has been carried out for decades. That could be just some few treatments in the natural forest to get a wanted product (see e.g. Ankarfjard 1998) or it could also be highly advanced systems where trees, animals and plants grow together so that they can make benefit of each other. These systems are not so widely described in literature, either internationally or nationally. The range these practices or systems hold is very little known by a wider audience than the actual farmers in the villages. To know more what the farmers traditionally practice and what techniques and plants etc that has been adopted from projects and outsiders are both important factors to understand when further developing the rural upland agricultural and forestry activities. This study which aims to find out more about ongoing agroforestry practices in two districts is hopefully a step on the track to find out more sustainable and acceptable practices for farmers in these areas.